Wednesday, 30 July 2008

Gracie's next-door neighbours: the rematch

The battle of wills over garden access at Gracie Towers has taken a turn for the worse. The neighbours have fitted a gate with a combination lock and invited all parties in the terrace to go through the rigmarole of unlocking and re-locking each time they pass along what is a shared access. Apparently - and astonishingly - they are within their rights. Can this possibly be true? Would any learned friends who happen to read this be prepared to advance an opinion (pro bono of course)?

I find myself in sympathy with Former Mrs Ink, who simply wants to walk her little dog, and have reluctantly suggested that she seek independent legal advice to confirm the position and possibly get a letter sent round promising to comply with the lock malarkey but insisting on her right to use the path. On the face of it there doesn't seem to be much else that can be done, and the law offers no remedy for what is plainly going on, which is sneaky intimidation designed to discourage use of the path.

Why are some neighbours such loathsome, petty shitbags? Suitable punishments ought to be available for wantonly objectionable types living next door, ideally modelled on those meted out to offenders in the Tudor age. I'd be more than happy to nail their ears to a pillory or indeed to remove their ears one at a time with a fortnight's gap in between so that the pain, apprehension and anxiety might be kept well burnished. I'd show those lads in Reservoir Dogs a thing or two. An ear or two, I meant to say.